Quote from: FreshJR on April 03, 2013, 09:26:04 PM

Quote from: Unacceptable on April 03, 2013, 09:11:30 PM

Quote from: Syke on April 03, 2013, 09:06:09 PM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on April 03, 2013, 06:44:44 PM

Although... I'd have expected a competent judge to contact me and ask my opinion on whether the device is capable of the 27 Gh/s required, in case my current results were the result of software issues. But it's immaterial, since as best as I can tell so far, I'm getting the most performance out of it that it can handle.

75% of 40 GH/s is 30 GH/s. The device didn't come close to the required speed for the bet. The bet was clearly won.

It was a 30GH unit (Little SC),not the 40 or 60GH unit..............................

LittleSC was not mentioned in the bet or announced when the bet was created.

3 products were mentioned in the yahoo artical libked from the bet.

And wouldn't the bet have been worded that way so that no other product later introduce can meet the requirements in the bet?