....
Pffft.
skepticalscience.com is a joke. Even their name. Typical carbon-tax scammers in all ways, and especially in their leaning on censorship to cover for their lack of 'science'. I find
Murry Salby to be much more rigorous and credible.
Skepsci is a propaganda operation, no more or less.
I'm curious...
Could you people please define what is a reliable source of information?
Because when I read you I get that:
Independent sites like skeptical science are a joke
Private medias like "Le Monde Diplomatique" are a joke
Popular medias like CNN are a joke
Governmental or international institutes like NASA are a joke
Where do you get your data from then?
I think it's safe to go to those who actually do it. Like research institutes or something. But then again it makes me wonder, do actual agencies and legitimate offices post updates and news somewhere? Like their own public website or something?