....
Any more posts by you that include statistics I will delete.
Here's some stats that you can delete (or not):
- 100% of my personal opinion of you is such that it cannot be posted in a PG forum
- 100% of your fanboy stats are worthless and skewed
- 0% is the statistical probability of you having any input in any conversation that has to do with Bitmain or Antminers that is not skewed by your opinion of the company and it's practices
- 0% is the statistical probability of you convincing anyone that passed a grade higher than 3 that 6:5, 12:10, 120:100, and 600:500 aren't all the same thing -1.2:1
- 0% of your deletion threats are given a shit about by anyone over 12 years old
My opinion of you is very low also, but that's not relevant.
My problems is that you are trying to tell me that what I spend a LOT of time on and know a LOT about regarding the statistics of the pool is false and your posts are incorrect in your comments about statistics.
And you have again said that above - this is false:
- 0% is the statistical probability of you convincing anyone that passed a grade higher than 3 that 6:5, 12:10, 120:100, and 600:500 aren't all the same thing -1.2:1
- 0% of your deletion threats are given a shit about by anyone over 12 years old
I don't care, but I guess you don't fall in that category of over 12?
My point is that you keep trying to tell me I'm wrong and you clearly do NOT understand statistics, thus I will continue to delete anything you post about statistics coz it pisses me off that it is something I spend so much time on and someone who clearly doesn't understand stats is telling me I'm wrong, when in fact I am impartial in the statistics I've reported.
Edit: P.S. I have never anywhere said that S9v1 is the cause of all the bad pool luck. That is something you said. I have simply reported that they have the WORST luck on the pool and they are at such a level that it suggests there is something wrong.
--
Edit2: here, although you want to tell me it's basic maths and you know what you are talking about, and I am wrong, I'll give you a simple example that points out you are wrong:
Flip a coin 3 times.
Say you get 2 heads and 1 tail - yeah that's not unexpected at all
Flip a coin 300 times.
Say you get 200 heads and 100 tails - yeah that is VERY unlikely.
It would mean there is VERY likely bias in the coin flipping process.