Quote from: philipma1957 on January 08, 2017, 04:45:29 PM

Quote from: kano on January 08, 2017, 04:31:50 PM

Quote from: ComputerGenie on January 08, 2017, 04:10:42 PM

Quote from: kano on January 08, 2017, 01:59:50 PM

...Edit: to avoid littering the thread with garbage again...

Do you ever actually read the words you're disagreeing with, or do you just always assume that every comment is contrary to your basal beliefs? Huh

I said this in my first post about it, that anyone can still see:

Quote

In the first case, there's no requirements on finding the first block ... it's just some time in the future.

I then pointed that out to you in your second reply telling me I'm wrong.

Then again you posted telling me how that isn't correct ... and 2 more stupid posts about it after that.

So I deleted it all - it was a waste of, what ended up being, 6 posts, and again pointless like before.

I don't care if you want to twist your words around so that you can pretend you didn't get it wrong.
It's yet again been a waste of my time for a while today ...

This is why computer genie is brilliant and one of the most skilled trolls I have ever seen. I find I am being discouraged to post correct info on block odds by his clever postings. Kano did you ever watch Peter Falk in Columbo? Computer genie is a true master of Detective Columbo's playing dumb method. He got you going correct?

MEANWHILE back to the thread more blocks please.

@philipma1957 VERY insightful & from the history of posts, looks to be spot on.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...
Thumbs up! --> MEANWHILE back to the thread more blocks please. <--