Re: Requesting DT members to have a clear stance on buying & selling accounts
You should learn to read before posting. I asked why Lauda and Lutpin have not responded to my concerns, I did not say anything about why Lauda and Lutpin are giving negative trust they way they are.
Since Lauda and Lutpin haven't responded to the actual concern, I decided to answer for you.I can't say why Lutpin or Lauda haven't responded to you, although I can guess that it's because you seem like nothing other than a whiny crybaby without common sense.
Maybe you have just a little bit too much incentives to make posts 
Then maybe you should ask ACE to not count that post towards my final count I post here because I want to. I couldn't care if I got paid or not.
To respond to your post in regards to what you (incorrectly) thought I was asking. You think that it would be okay for me to steal a little bit of money if I make some kind of contribution to the forum?
That's an invalid comparison; you're comparing two things that affect reputation differently. It wouldn't be alright to scam anyone regardless of reputation, as shown in many previous cases.What you are saying is that you believe the trust system is a 'boys club' in which it's members can do as they wish, and everyone else is at the wrath of it's members.
I don't believe that at all, I'm saying it is common sense to let someone off with a minor offense (if you can call it that, considering it depends on the person judging) if they have contributed a large amount to the forum. There are many people with differing opinions on the DT network. If Lauda and Lutpin actually did something as bad as you (and the people that have strangely similar opinions and grammatical choices) like to make out, there would be nothing stopping others from either removing them from the network or countering their ratings.
I think the reason why Lauda and Lutpin have not left negative trust to the people mentioned above is something along the lines of :
And there is nothing stopping you from having those opinions, however there is a much simpler explanation that has already been said by myself and others.No way Lauda would leave negative feedback to this powerful guys. Lauda was a coward and corrupted woman. She will only leave negative feedbacks to accounts who can't hit him back.
Or maybe it is something closer to along the lines of this:Personally, I'm very skeptical and suspicious of these poorly concealed attempts at grabbing more power across the forum, at first through such "interest checks" and then by kicking up a racket about "elections" of a new global moderator...
That doesn't fit your agenda though, so I can see why you wouldn't accept it.