Quote from: housebtc on January 10, 2017, 05:52:03 AM

Quote from: gbdesai on January 10, 2017, 05:24:53 AM

Quote from: drnash85 on January 10, 2017, 03:25:31 AM

Ark and Chronobank should be on the ICNX

Shouldn't they be available first? Also it violates their ICNX rule for maturity, think coins need to be up and running for 6 months minimum and neither of these has even rolled out.

More importantly these were good candidates for.thr performance fund which is all ICOs but as far as we know they didn't invest in either, that may be telling.

ARK and Chronobank should be included for what reason? ARK to me has nothing to offer in terms of technology the idea is ambiguous.

They are not launched yet. If they go big they will list on ICNX. CB is better than ARK, btw.