Quote from: Reavon on January 10, 2017, 11:02:09 AM

Quote from: Virtum on January 10, 2017, 10:32:09 AM

https://lisknation.com/lisk-the-decentralization-debate-aca78ec5f819#.hbe1n2a9r

Problem #1: The Lisk team holds too much voting weight and therefore Lisk is not decentralized.
Problem #2: The Lisk team intends to utilize their voting weight to pay employees and hand-pick the active delegation.
Problem #3: Does the Lisk team really trust the DPoS model?

Lisk is a big big problem for those who invest in it.

Wrong. You are simply wrong and you should feel sorry for that.

#1: Lisk amount held by Lisk Team is not 51% thus they are not the driving force in the network.
We investors are. And should something malliciouse happen we can and will revote delegates that fix the problem.

#2: source?!

#3: this is a question your simple mind asks and not a description of a problem!

So please can you explain to me why you are here? A reasonable debate obviously it is not that you seek.

He just copied the subheadlines from the last section of the referenced article and didn't even realise that without providing more context #3 is no problem per se. Oh man ...