Quote from: manselr on January 11, 2017, 07:23:58 PM

1) Big blocks with centralized network and fast and cheap big volume onchain payments
2) Conservative blocks with decentralized network with second layer on top for the fast and cheap big volume payments

oh be quiet with your fake only 2 option scenarios..

thinking dynamic blocks leads to centralization is a failure of your understanding.

you do realise that having litenode, no witness mode, pruned mode, LN hub mode has far higher risk of diluting the full node counts.

as for dynamic blocks.. if nodes cant cope with a large rise in bandwidth, they wont vote for it..
dynamic blocks are also "conservative"(to use the scripted rhetoric buzzword of the core fanboys) by only activating extra buffer when the majority flag that they can cope with it. meaning sensible natural capable rises over time.

please slap whoever is passing you the fake rhetoric to repeat.

the obvious buzzwords repeated simultaneously by one sided biased people is becoming very clear its a script you lot are reading
"conservative" "bigblocks"

the funny thing is those wanting onchain scaling want 2mb.. the BIPS show this.
the group with the 4mb weight.. is actually the crew passing out the scripts of buzzwords pointing the finger in the other direction..