Quote from: Puffy23 on January 12, 2017, 05:42:17 PM

Quote from: m1n1ngP4d4w4n on January 12, 2017, 05:20:17 PM

Quote from: Puffy23 on January 12, 2017, 04:56:36 PM

Quote from: D8V1D on January 12, 2017, 04:14:20 AM

v11.0

Driver 15.12
R9 Nano 393 H/s
R9 Fury 387 H/s

*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner

Driver 16.11
RX 480 260 H/s

I have 6 Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro on Windows 10 with 8 gigs of RAM and an i5 (I know it's overkill, it was just collecting dust though).

CM Version: 10.0
Drivers: 16.11.5
a: 2
i: 6
Hash: 375 H/s

CM Version: 11.0
Drivers: 15.12
a: 2
asm: 1
i: 6
Hash: 397 H/s

The 16.11 series drivers were always about 10% faster than 15.12 for the Fiji. It makes me wonder if asm was compatible with the 16.11 family drivers could we get as much as 420 H/s from the Fiji? Also, not sure if -asm overrides -a, haven't done any testing with it and the documentation is pretty bare.

How much power are you drawing with this rig ? (do you have measurement for 1 card ?)

I broke my only kill-o-watt meter around CM v8.0 or so and haven't replaced it. I will get one next day delivered so I can update you.

Pure speculation from my previous tinkering and what others have reported: each card can easily get 300 H/s @ 100W (this was achieved in CM v9.0). Running full bore at 400 H/s I'd guess it's 200W. Again, this is pure speculation. I will update when the new meter shows up.

Edit: Have 2 kilowatt meters arriving tomorrow.

Nice thx, that could be interesting, especially the performance @100w, i can get the same model as you for 230$ (Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro Tri-X OC - 4GB), if it does 300sols+ @100w that could be very interesting to get them.