Quote from: bing on June 06, 2011, 02:51:40 PM

Quote from: eturnerx on June 06, 2011, 02:20:59 PM

I'd like to add that I pledge to reinvest the first dividend payout that I receive into purchasing more SIN shares at the going rate on GLBSE rounded up to the nearest share.
I am likely to extend this pledge for future dividend payouts.

I say this simply because I would like to see long-term expansion via new investor funds, but believe that new investor funds will not happen without a dividend payout. I aim to make any dividend payout to myself as neutral for SIN as possible.

+1

I agree, this would help growing the business aswell.

So, basically, by paying out divends, new investors will gain faith in SIN. But there will also be re-investment from the current shareholders.

My opinion is that all the BTCs generated at this point should be payed out as divends, since then it's up to the shareholders to re-invest them.
If, let say, 30% of the generated BTCs comes back as investments, the shares will be sold faster, and therefore you will get the capital you need to grow.

Using mined BTCs for investments without getting any shares for it is a little bit unfair, since the first investors (like me) will basically give my investment to the investors which buys shares when they are almost sold out.

If generated BTCs isn't payed out as divends, and instead invested by you into SIN, the best time to buy SIN-shares is at the end, when the initial shares are almost sold out, and by then, "my"(and other early investors) investments have made their impact on SIN, making us wait for payout, while late investors can cash out more faster.

So without the divends, We, early investors, will gain less (over time) than late investors

Don't get me wrong Tawsix, I like this idea and I believe in you. But just like eturnex, I'd like YOU to give the shareholders the choice and the opportunity to re-invest our divends into SIN, by simply... by paying out the divends

+1