Quote from: altcoinUK on January 18, 2017, 04:05:25 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on January 18, 2017, 03:44:08 PM

Quote from: altcoinUK on April 21, 2016, 03:23:06 AM

Quote from: iotatoken on April 20, 2016, 09:16:40 PM

Quote from: zanzibar on April 20, 2016, 08:12:13 PM

Quote from: iotatoken on April 20, 2016, 06:17:45 PM

Quote from: rlh on April 20, 2016, 05:33:55 PM

Sorry to be the broken record this time, but is there any news as of late? Discussions and posts have slowed down the past few days here, on chat and in the official IOTA forum.

This is the community's responsibility. They can't expect a handful of people to create the tech, do all the marketing, do all the branding, do all the adoption work etc. and also be responsible for how active the current holders of IOTA is. Everyone should be doing their community part.

A community cannot be established without the ability to exchange Iota, plain and simple. People will step up to fill specific roles but without Iota changing hands, users are stagnant. Rlh is far from a troll or inactive community member so I find your response a bit overly defensive and inappropriate.

Ah, I see, this is why I was in touch with so many projects and start-ups for Ethereum half a year before launch, gotcha.

LoL

Scammer David boy has realised that not one real IoT business gives a monkey's about his crypto nonsense - no wonder nobody care as there is no IOTA IoT system nor ever will one exists, and the blockhain for IoT is a dead end proposition anyway -, so he is starting to blame the community for not creating the ecosystem.

The scammer lured out $500k from the idiots, and then he blames the clueless investors - who bought the IOTA tokens for purely speculation purposes - for not creating an IoT ecosystem. The IOTA "investors" (i.e. idiots) know no more about IoT than my grandmother did before she died in 1969, but the scammer David boy expects the clueless "investors" make the IoT dream a reality.

No startups makes any money in IoT, even more established businesses like Thingworx with its limitless resources unable to make any money in the sector, but the scammer blames the community for not delivering what he promised he will deliver.

As I said from the beginning, there is zero chance a scammer who hides in the shithole of Belarus and a 27 years old wanker with zero relevant industry experience could make money with a blockchain solution in the corporate driven and hugely political IoT sector. Absolutely zero chance. No wonder there is zero progress in the IoT front since October when they presented the blatant IOTA IoT lie as nobody in the IoT world cares about the nonsenses of these two scammers. Still, the the scammer David boy blames the community for his total failure. What a wanker.

Notice he spells realised not realized as the new altcoinUK. This is hacked or stolen for sure.

Sure, and he spells sometimes organisation and other time organization, or centralisation vs centralization. What a fucking effective investigative journalist you would be

I can see now that you are heavily supporting Byteball. I was not bashing Byteball. Bytaball seems a very nice project though I know very little about it, only what I read in the last 30 minutes. The Byteballs developers delivered a lot which is admirable. It is also admirable the Bytaball project was not distributed via an ICO. Still the websocket based networking of Bytaball is inferior to a peer to peer solution what normally a cryptocurrency project aims to be. Bitcoin, Skycoin, Ethereum, Gadgetcoin, most cryptocurrencies including IOTA aim to be a permissionless solution. The websocket based Byteball is not that.

Heavily supporting Byteball? I would read that again I am fully against Byteballs distributional model and have called for a clone and for it to be distributed more fairly.