Quote from: Make-A-Buck on January 18, 2017, 09:22:38 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on January 18, 2017, 06:35:21 PM

This speaks for itself. I am hoping for it to get greener for the year.

I have a new R4 coming how well are they doing here? Better then the old firmware s9's I moved away?

Quote from: kano on January 14, 2017, 01:23:43 AM

Quote from: Make-A-Buck on January 14, 2017, 01:19:31 AM

Quote from: kano on January 14, 2017, 12:48:27 AM

Quote from: -EOS- on January 14, 2017, 12:16:15 AM

Quote from: Make-A-Buck on January 14, 2017, 12:05:22 AM

Quote from: kano on January 13, 2017, 11:55:26 AM

Latest update of the miner all time stats (since May 2016)

Code:

CDF[Erl] | Miner | DiffAcc
0.997872 | S9v1 | 27,650.93G | 112.59655135 BDR | 84 Blocks
0.798780 | A7v2 | 513.85G | 1.60335652 BDR | 1 Block
0.531652 | A7v1 | 2,851.43G | 9.91705950 BDR | 10 Blocks
0.167142 | S9v2 | 5,683.25G | 19.28094844 BDR | 24 Blocks

All OK as usual ... except S9v1 Tongue

Not a single block from any of the new R4's?
Wonder how many R4's are in live the pool?
Mine has been hashing away for almost a month now. Hope it finds a block for us soon.
Thanks for the update.

That's a good point! No R4's have found a block yet on the pool..

They probably fall under S9v2 - bitmain don't say "S9" they just say the version of their fork.
So they are probably S9v2 - if someone wants to tell me a worker that is only R4 I can check to see what they call themselves.

My only miner is an R4 B2.
Worker Name: wblaster.antMiner_R4_mab

OK, that shows the same firmware as S9v2 - so I'll mark that from now on as S9v2+R4v2

Will be hard to tell how the new R4's are doing because they show up the same as an S9v2.

Well if auto tune r4 firmware is the same as s9 auto tune firmware the assumption would be they make blocks at a decent pace.

So my 30th in older manual tune s9's remains with f2pool
I will expand on kano with the auto-tune R4 which should not hurt luck.