Quote from: johhnyUA on January 23, 2017, 06:37:34 PM

Quote from: eternalgloom on January 23, 2017, 04:11:26 PM

Quote from: johhnyUA on January 19, 2017, 09:11:03 PM

Bad idea, and there some important reason:
1. What do you mean, then say "anonymous" ? Bitsquare already anonymous and deventralized.
But how many peolple using Bitsquare? Less then number of peoples which use Poloniex or Bitfinex.
You ask me: Why that? And i will answer you: because decentralized exhanger is worse then centralized (Poloniex as an example)
Commision bigger then at centralized, it's harder to trade and there more opportunites for thiefs to steal your money. Or your time, while you will be waiting till arbitrator'll solve your problem. Also, arbitrator can check your real personal information (like a video call or e-mail). At the centralized exhanger you can use fake document.

To be fair, Poloniex and Bitfinex have been around much longer than Bitsquare.
I could really see Bitsquare taking off in the next couple of years, there are already quite a few buyers and sellers on there and I've persoanlly used it without any issues.

Commissions are currently a bit larger than at a centralized exchnage, but that's only because there is less competition, once it gets more popular, that will change.

it's never be more popular. Humanity is developed in another direction. Because of that things like Iphone becoming more popular. Most of people year by year more become similar to kids. They dont want to think and to work their brains. Decentralized exhangers will be very hard and uncomfortable for them.

By that kind of logic, people would also not get into Bitcoin, since that also requires one to learn how the Bitcoin technology works. That's a really big generalization that you're making, even if decentralized exchanges remain somewhat of a niche, that doesn't mean that they can't be successful and have reasonable popularity.