~Snipped~
No, it is a disadvantage because they need funds. Without a good amount of trading to generate interest, the second ICO might not go well. Unless they have investors lined up, refusing to pay the 3 BTC to Bittrex is shortsighted.
The snarl-like developments and updates from devs after first ICO may have an effect on how well the second ICO will be. I just hope Egaas is not another ICO scam. The devs barely communicate with the community and No Exchange has listed Egaas until now and it's over 30 days already since first ICO ended.