Quote from: ghoul on January 27, 2017, 06:38:23 AM

Quote from: mandica on January 27, 2017, 06:12:41 AM

Quote from: complexring on January 27, 2017, 05:50:22 AM

Quote from: mandica on January 27, 2017, 05:29:06 AM

Quote from: complexring on January 27, 2017, 04:27:15 AM

Quote from: Bitman86 on January 27, 2017, 04:22:35 AM

Quote from: complexring on January 27, 2017, 03:56:30 AM

Quote from: Bitman86 on January 27, 2017, 03:50:50 AM

The ICO has already closed. But you can still buy Spectrecoin very cheaply in the exchanges.

Spectre is the only network, which has absolute anonymity, any comparison is just another example.

Wow. Seems like you can't read two posts above you. Roll Eyes

It is outdated info, Shadow already corrected that vulnerability, in addition Shadow did not implement TOR.
Spectrecoin was born without such vulnerabilities.

I'm sorry. What is outdated info? Shadow corrected the vulnerability using the Eclipse Crypto devs' solution and Eclipse Crypto had TOR implemented when they originally launched back in February '16. Didn't Spectre launch this month?

Tell me again how you can make the claim the Spectre is the only network with absolute anonymity and also be the first? Roll Eyes

As far as I am aware SDC has never integrated Tor or I2P into their code base although they may be planning to. What we are saying is that we are currently the only crypto with ring signatures, dual key stealth addresses AND integrated Tor.

I understand what you are saying, and I agree with that other poster actually says. He's not saying that Shadow ever integrated Tor or I2P in their code or had any plans to, but rather that Eclipse Crypto took the Shadow source code and properly (as far as I can tell) implemented ring signatures and also implemented TOR.

He even points out the fact (by pointing out the relevant functions that are used in the source code) that XSPEC implements the same algorithm that Eclipse Crypto did for generating a Key Image, and it appears this algorithm was also subsequently used by XSPEC.

All of this was done more than 10 months before XSPEC.

As such, you can't make the claim that you are the first.

If you would read and follow the links (bitcointalk thread which points to github) that were provided to you, you'd see that to be the case ...

Easy enough to dig through the details if you want.

Instead, you re-assert the exact same statements that Y_0 is claiming not to be true; he even provides enough of the details for you to look into it yourself. In fact, if you read that Eclipse Crypto thread that is linked, you'll see that the Eclipse Crypto account refers to Y_0 as one of their devs. Why he made that post in this XSPEC thread that didn't indicate he is one of the Eclipse Crypto devs that is beyond me. Modesty or maybe he didn't want to derail the conversation, except to simply point out the true historical events for people who are capable of doing some (basic) research (especially when it doesn't take too long).

Regardless, repeating a claim over and over again doesn't make it any more valid particularly when it's proven to be the case otherwise.

Ok, I see what you are saying, EC, seems to be a dead coin where the devs own almost 50% of the coins and the dev hasn't been active since mid 2016. In contrast XSPEC has active development and will expand and improve on the code base we are using and develop a unique mobile platform for anonymous cash transfer.

We will also expand on our privacy features and if you follow for a while you will see.

Meh.
Just because you think a coin is dead or lacks of activity does not make you eligible to twist the facts or deny them. He talks about 'historical events', and wether a coin is active or not has no impact on
these events. Spectre makes claims which are obviously not correct, they were pointed out by member Y_0.
Simple as that.

To make a coin look bad by saying is seems to be dead and the devs own a certain % percentage of the supply is not they way to confess you're wrong and he's right.
Come on, all you do (after you have to accept he's right) is to talk bad about the other coin?
Lame.

I had never heard of EC until today and nobody has mentioned it until today so I was unaware of it's existence.