Quote from: DrMsEr on January 27, 2017, 09:47:56 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 27, 2017, 07:53:30 AM

If you have existing positive trust, then you are more likely to receive additional positive trust, and are less likely to receive negative trust verses someone who has a neutral trust rating (or a very small amount of positive trust); this is even more pronounced when looking at those in the DT network.

But wasn't that case with you, you received multiple crush feedback simultaneously.

It took a while for me to receive my first negative rating, and a while for the 2nd....after that they started piling on.

Quote from: DrMsEr on January 27, 2017, 09:47:56 AM

Not to be going off topic, If i/some common member would accused be accused of exortion or shit like what launda do then i would had received a lot of negative feedback saying that i should not be here or other member should not deal with me. So why this partiality with lauda?

Lauda is close to many people in the DT network, and close to many people with very high trust ratings (this is no accident on the part of lauda).

Quote from: DrMsEr on January 27, 2017, 09:47:56 AM

It is sad that people who are on top notch are forming allies and doing all sort of un-ethical stuffs.

I concur.

Quote from: DrMsEr on January 27, 2017, 09:47:56 AM

If Pulling a self escrow is such a offensive here -48: -6 / +16
then what about extortion :??.

I would note that when I was taken down that a number of other very trustworthy people who routinely prevented scams were also effectively taken down as well -- they at least are no longer around to be preventing these scams/scammers. I suspect that those who have "taken over" so to speak as the "scam patrol" have questionable ethics at best, and have ulterior motives for their actions at worse.