The main difference lies in the fact that SegWit aims to restructure the block space to allow more transactions per block, while Unlimited aims simply to raise the blocksize to allow more transaction.
You seem to be misstating your summary.
Bitcoin Unlimited attempts to change consensus thresholds. That's no minor or inconsequential change.
This is all the banks doings, tell me something, what happens if network could handle 400 transactions per second? who really gets hurt?
I know the answer: banks. our masters are controlling and limiting bitcoin as well, satoshi failed big time.
What the fuck are you talking about?
Bitcoin already, in its current status, is a pretty robust challenge to status quo banks, considering how you use it .. but powerful indeed... even in its supposed "limited" state of affairs (I assume you are referring to the current 1 mb hardlimit in the blocksize).