Quote from: Lauda on January 30, 2017, 10:18:55 PM

Quote from: rizzlarolla on January 30, 2017, 07:32:51 PM

Signature campaigns have got "a bit" cleaner lately, since my input was making clear how many "farmed" accounts were taking the places of real members. (not that many real members would want to advertise the latest batch of scams would they?)

I would only modify this statement to better reflect the situation by changing it to:"Some signature campaigns..". There are plenty of those that are full of shitposters.

Ok, i can probably agree with that. After all, i know how much work it can be to fight this problem when there is an endless supply of new farmed accounts ready to try to replace "blacklisted" accounts. You were the only mod i could see doing anything.
(but now you got yourself fired)

Quote from: Lauda on January 30, 2017, 10:18:55 PM

Quote from: rizzlarolla on January 30, 2017, 07:32:51 PM

The forum was on it's knee's under the weight of spam until (i speculate) i forced SMAS to pretend to be against spam.
But previously they helped create the problem.

You have? That must have been something during the first SMAS attempt. IIRC it was me who revived it with the blacklist idea when I started to manage Bitmixer.

I think we both played a part in getting things done, and making things clearer. It can only be a sticking plaster against this.
Two (global?) mods have told me tonight i should get a new hobby. Piss off rizzlarolla?
They have not acted against farmed accounts. They love Fatanut?

Quote from: Lauda on January 30, 2017, 10:18:55 PM

Quote from: rizzlarolla on January 30, 2017, 07:32:51 PM

Senior DT members must also be involved. Their inaction shows this.

Yes, and no. It is really hard to say who pulls what strings in certain cases. However, a lot of 'serious DT' members have abandoned this 'ship' due to inaction.

Yeah, a lot are gone, some are sold(?). The remainer's (in the higher ranks) have overseen bitcointalks decline.
I'm not well versed in DT.

Quote from: Lauda on January 30, 2017, 10:18:55 PM

Quote from: rizzlarolla on January 30, 2017, 07:32:51 PM

It feels to me like Greg maxwell is also compliant. He moderates here.

If I'm correct, he spends very little time in here. There's no need to target individuals though. No staff member has the 'power' to do a 'cleanup' or make 'desired changes'.

Ok, i probably should have said core or blockstream? Luke j also moderates?
It is a failure by association. They are linked to theymos here and elsewhere.
This failure likely suits their agenda also.

Quote from: Lauda on January 30, 2017, 10:18:55 PM

Quote from: rizzlarolla on January 30, 2017, 07:32:51 PM

Others here (or gone more likely) must see the same.

Correct. See my previous remark on DT members.

That is evident by the response's in this thread over 5 months. Nothing, or nearly nothing.

Quite "thought provoking" my post. You don't seem to have any real big problem with my thinking Lauda?