Quote from: lenyro on January 31, 2017, 10:07:12 AM

Quote from: nelson4lov on January 31, 2017, 10:02:51 AM

Quote from: Ais08 on January 31, 2017, 09:25:50 AM

Quote from: disconnectme on January 30, 2017, 08:03:53 PM

I think the idea of second ICO should not come up now, the team need to show they are capable of delivering on what was promised initially, nobody would invest into the second ICO unless there is something on ground.

True, I also like-minded with you, with the ICO first they run a lot of people to invest for this project, but if they run the ICO to-2, worrying all invetor to invest in ICO them, seeing things like this no explanation in exchange for offering themselves in exchange good ..

I'm Not entirely sure about that. The Second ICO starts March 1st but with the slow development and Updates from the team, Not sure they'll get as much as they got during first ICO.

Quote from: rindo on January 31, 2017, 09:00:38 AM

Well Yobit,and MERCATOX has rejected eGaas and c-cex till now no one give a vote there and team doing to get crypropia no result yet but i wanted to know do you pay them for listing i mean for cryptopia ? how about novaexchange whether it has contacted them , not much choice for egaas i guess

A Project like Egaas should have Little or No difficulties getting listed on Exchange. If Free listing aren't coming through, The team is capable of getting paid listing for their token.

Are you serious and so sure that they have little or no difficulty? Actually IMO the truth is the opposite, they can hardly list the token to an exchange, many bounty players can't sell for tokens, or ICO investors.

Perhaps the factor of the team about the lack of news or the latest information on this project, with the possibility of constraints in many refusals of exchange trading site for egaas, so I tried to wait for the next few weeks regarding the development of this project ...