Quote from: ImHash on February 01, 2017, 08:44:41 AM

A few times loling after seeing a newbie named "LickMyA*s" and a huge black woman with slang writing style commenting on this topic.
@OP if you are legitimately running business you shouldn't have received any negative trust at all.

There is no relation between I running a legitimate business and criminals I called out post personal opinions and nonsense in my feedback section. I think you mix negative feedback with negative "trust".

If I never breached the trust of anyone, how can I have negative "trust"? Does this make any sense?

Quote from: ImHash on February 01, 2017, 08:44:41 AM

instead of going to court with community as detectives, judges and bounty hunters, you need to prove you are trustworthy in action and by doing what you supposed to do this is not the proper path you're taking.

You can read on Game Protect website that I am trustworthy in action. There are a lot of people claiming that I am a scammer, thief, etc.. And if this is true, then there should be proof available of who I scammed and for how much.

Now, the only thing the haters and attackers have to do, is post the proof here in the thread and get 5 BTC. I have no idea why people complain about this offer?

Oh wait, maybe people complain in general about Game Protect, because I call out criminals and try to protect customers and not because I did something wrong? Yeah, I think this is the explanation.

Quote from: ImHash on February 01, 2017, 08:44:41 AM

I got red tagged and went crying to every DT2 members and DT1 and admins, at the end what really helped me was reasoning with the person who tagged me though those members and admins might have played some part and if they did I'm grateful, but you need to swallow it even though it's bitter.

I personally do not care about this feedback system, as everyone can state what ever nonsense he like. I could only consider provable feedback based on facts.

One thing is clear, the one who make false and misleading statements in the feedback section of someone, is the one who is untrustworthy and not the one who receive it. Logic?