Quote from: SuperVillain on February 05, 2017, 12:44:51 PM

I heard that he's only admin not owner. If you think they are prejudiced agaisnt bu why they didn't ban you?

because no matter how much trolls try to ringfence me into a band camp. im thinking about the bitcoin consensus network.
yea i detest blockstream because i have seen what they are upto.

same cant be said for those idolising/defending blockstream, but not thinking about or understanding the bitcoin network itself
lauda for instance doesnt know C++ to have read a line of code to be a critical enough advocate for his 'belief's'

as you yourself are using the term hardfork, without understand consensus vs bilateral split.

yep even softforks can cause bilateral splits. (mind blowing)

its worth you realising the umbrella terms first and learn about bitcoin before defending a corporation that is desperate need to open up commercial services to repay them investors. especially if you are hoping for a pay day by being loyal to them corporate investors

here ill help you learn about the umbrella term 'hardfork' you use but dont seem to understand

firstly learn consensus agreement vs bilateral split.

too many times people only speak of the best case scenario of soft and the worse case of hard.(they know why they do it!!)
but effectively the only difference between soft and hard is who gets to vote to activate..

soft.. pool votes nodes dont.
hard.. nodes vote then pools.

but in both soft and hard. both can have consensus, both can be controversial and both can have bilateral

softfork: consensus - >94% pools no banning/ignoring of minority. result: small 5% orphan drama then one chain. minority unsynced and dead
softfork: controversial - >50% pools no banning/ignoring of minority. result: long big% orphan drama then one chain. minority unsynced and dead
softfork: bilateral - intentionally ignoring/banning opposing rules and not including them. result: 2 chains

hardfork: consensus - >94% nodes, then >94% pools no banning/ignoring of minority. result: 5% orphan drama then one chain. minority unsynced / dead
hardfork: controversial - >50% nodes, then >50% pools no banning/ignoring of minority. result: big% orphan drama then one chain. minority unsynced / dead
hardfork: bilateral - intentionally ignoring/banning opposing rules and not including them. result: 2 chains

to make an actual altcoin you need to do more then just make bigger blocks or send an erroneous transaction.. as that just causes rejects/orphans.

you need to actually make the nodes ignore the opposing data and nodes so that they are not sticking to the same data. and instead walk in opposite directions

high agreement = less orphans/rejects
low agreement = more orphans/rejects
but if you have another clause to avoid rejecting or even seeing the opposition. then you are risking creating an altcoin