Quote from: franky1 on February 06, 2017, 06:54:26 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on February 06, 2017, 06:32:01 PM

Quote from: Lauda on February 06, 2017, 06:21:11 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on February 06, 2017, 05:18:38 PM

It's really simple: don't turn up into Bitcoin, proposing to change the parts of Bitcoin that keep Bitcoin safe, then accuse the original Bitcoiners of tribalism when they dare to voice opposition! You're retarded if you really believe this nonsense

Quite ironic, isn't it?

Great idea: try to start a tribe.... inside a pre-existing tribe, then label the dissenters as invaders. These people are past immoral

so
satoshi qt the original tribe.. then in 2013 another tribe within the pre-existing tribe starts, call it core.. which then tribals off again in 2014 as blockstream.. with 'white chief poking-bear' as tribal leader
then label the dissenters (those that are not old qt) as the invaders is immoral.

i think CB doesnt understand the word ironic, otherwise he would realise he is defending the immoral tribe he tries to describe.

why is it blockstream defenders play the victim card by doing the exact thing they point at others. especially when its obvious that al they care about is tribal leaders and not the whole bitcoin community

We get it
You think Blockstream is New world order and all that stuff
Let's get back to topic, shall we?