Quote from: hajimasan on February 07, 2017, 11:18:12 AM

31000 line of code is not a big task for any programmers because I am just a moderate level programmer and writing 1000 to 2000( or may be more then that ) line of code is daily time table so I think writing 31000 line for a revolutionary technology is not behind our imagination. its possible to do that may he had some assistance or if he was alone then also writing 31000 line would hardly 1 month and for logics and algorithms and testing I will give him 1 year to write those and I think its enough

It all depends upon which kind of code is this

I think that 31k lines of code are just enough to make it totally beyond and above understanding of any human being even if they tried to comprehend the logic behind it all their lifetime (provided that it was in fact written by an intelligence by far surpassing that of a human being). And I specifically refer to program logic (i.e. what exactly this code is doing), not coding style like unreadable variables (which could be easily changed, anyway). On the other hand, if it is flat logic, then 31k lines are in fact nothing beyond our imagination

Quote from: Daniel91 on February 07, 2017, 03:30:50 PM

Quote from: TechnoYogi on February 07, 2017, 10:13:07 AM

Couldn't Satoshi Nakamoto be an A.I. Bitcoin's implementation was certainly complex involving 31,000 lines of code. Bitcoin was probably created by an A.I. What do you guys think?

Even A.I. someone should create

Even if it should be created by someone, that doesn't in the least mean that its capabilities will be limited by the capabilities of its creator. Is a calculator's calculating power limited by those who invented it?