Quote from: Riseman on February 13, 2017, 01:44:21 AM

Quote from: arielbit on February 13, 2017, 12:18:41 AM

...
of course there is zero information, it was an interview not some geek laboratory/tutorial stuff. I just said Dash is a fork and private send is a fork...and forking means inheriting what's also in bitcoin and coin join...you didn't get the picture do you?

i called it a lame-ass manual because just looking at these is quite funny, you know that is a lame ass technology too.
...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2016/11/01/federal-prosecutor-kathryn-haun-on-how-criminals-use-bitcoin-and-how-she-catches-them/#16b02b4f7886

Quote

why some newer technologies called tumblers and mixers, which attempt to obscure the trail of bitcoins as they travel from bitcoin address to bitcoin address, could be unscrambled.

now.. back to Evan
...

OMFG. You can quit hurting your brain with making up arguments like these and just reply with "I don't like Dash" to every post. This will deliver the same amount of information Wink

1. There is zero information on them breaking CoinJoin either so it doesn't prove anything. I assume they just work together with honeypot mixer operators or use some flaws in certain implementations. If there are some known flaws in Dash privacy implementation, post them here.

2. I agree, it's not perfect, but it is as easy as it gets. If thinking several hours ahead and making 2 extra mouse clicks is "lame-ass" for you then I can't help you and you better not use crypto at all. And you must already be having trouble with planning your personal finances using regular money.

3. Changing the topic to instamine means you agree that "deceptively hidden" was not true, ok

But you can quote Evan telling about MNs to prove that he was hiding them again, it's fun.

The instamine may have been intentional, maybe not. But hiding information on masternodes? WTF?

Quote

1. There is zero information on them breaking CoinJoin either so it doesn't prove anything. I assume they just work together with honeypot mixer operators or use some flaws in certain implementations. If there are some known flaws in Dash privacy implementation, post them here.

based from the article i've posted it was a federal agent who knows stuff (mix/obfuscate bitcoins) who got caught, DASH and private send is a fork of bitcoin technologies, it is time for "non-fork" technologies to dominate the privacy sector of crypto currencies. what i'm posting here are "insights" not a hack or crack.

Quote

2. I agree, it's not perfect, but it is as easy as it gets. If thinking several hours ahead and making 2 extra mouse clicks is "lame-ass" for you then I can't help you and you better not use crypto at all. And you must already be having trouble with planning your personal finances using regular money.

remember i compared DASH to cassette tapes? you remember using them? how difficult is it to get to the 4th track at the middle of the tape? it is just "two clicks" forward and play Wink

back to your manual...(against my timing attack Grin

)

you bought a 100$ worth of DASH just to spend 80$ worth of DASH? .. you know how absurd this is in the real world adoption?
and you wait for two days (variable-could be more days) to spend your anon DASH? ... i say i choose the cassette tape over DASH LOL! i can fast forward to track #4 in just under a minute, now that's fast! LOL!

Quote

3. Changing the topic to instamine means you agree that "deceptively hidden" was not true, ok

But you can quote Evan telling about MNs to prove that he was hiding them again, it's fun.

okay..now don't put words into my mouth...

it (masternode concept) was deceptively hidden to accumulate Xcoins for more than a month..and it was also a perfect motive for Evan and co. to orchestrate the instamine.

this argument separates my investigation from your criticisms like, "why Evan didn't do the typical copy-paste, hype, pump and dump shitcoin?".