Quote from: CryptoInsiders on February 13, 2017, 08:09:02 AM

Quote from: MoveCrypto on February 13, 2017, 07:59:57 AM

Quote from: CryptoInsiders on February 13, 2017, 07:56:15 AM

Bittrex is almost DEAD... it's got NO VOLUME, how's that going to help ICN?

You're repeating yourself over and over and you just demonstrated your stupidity again by entirely missing the point.

- Kraken's securities-expert lawyers approved ICN listing

- Bittrex owner debunked the fud that there was any regulation problem with listing ICN.
He verified that the reason it was listed on Kraken and not other exchanges is because ICN devs gave Kraken green light, but not yet any other exchanges.

Most major exchanges don't list a coin/token unless they get approval from the devs.

Bittrex owner said ICN is "not getting listed soon" because it's a Security Token you moron.
ICN founders said repeatedly that they tried to list ICN on Poloniex & kept hiding behind NDA's because Poloniex refused to list ICN because it's a Security Token.

Bittrex owner said they're "working on other things" meaning ICNX trading, which will only accelerate the dilution of ICN price & market cap since dividends from ICNX will remain minuscule for months.

You're trying to twist his quote to fit your troll fud narrative. His actual quote was "not getting listed soon" because "one of the founders" "wasn't interested in getting ION listed on any additional exchanges."

I will post it again. People can read what he actually said:

Bittrex and Poloniex listed DAO no problem, and that's also a dividend-paying ethereum token. Kraken's team of lawyers also approved both DAO and ICN.