Quote from: kiklo on February 14, 2017, 08:45:50 AM

Quote from: Lauda on June 23, 2013, 08:41:04 PM

I agree on this, imo POS is better, let's see how it goes with this coin, you never know.

You're quoting something which was written by this account.. 4 years ago? Are you delusional?

Quote from: kiklo on February 14, 2017, 08:45:50 AM

FYI: LOL, You claimed Galvin knew it was a problem, so you made him an authority in your post , which his own words refuted your post. Cheesy

No. Gavin is a fool. I referred to him only as he is the author of said proposal/implementation.

Quote from: hv_ on February 14, 2017, 09:01:04 AM

Yep - and with BU you just set it to what such a security modeling is proofed to be ok - so even you say it starts with 2MB - > 1.5 MB might be good or even 2.5MB - and with future improvments up to agreed 8MB?

BU is a horrible nightmare. That "emergent consensus" thing is a complete revamp of the security model, and yet some supporters attack Segwit for potential security issues. That is quite hypocritical.

Quote from: hv_ on February 14, 2017, 09:01:04 AM

Why the hack promoting 2nd layer gaming first? (see the word game in it ? )

If you're referring to Segwit, then you're wrong. The only thing that could be considered a "hack" is the way that luke-jr figured out to deploy Segwit as a soft fork. That's it.