Quote from: Lauda on February 14, 2017, 10:28:34 AM

Quote from: kiklo on February 14, 2017, 10:25:57 AM

Or the fact you say LN does not need segwit, but yet they can't activate LN.

You can't activate something that isn't ready for deployment. There are several different implementations of LN. You should be banned from this forum for trolling.

Quote from: Lauda on February 14, 2017, 10:28:34 AM

LN will be superior than transacting on-chain. Both cheaper and faster. You don't need the on-chain security for trivial purchases.

You all talk like LN is the solution and then you admit it is not even far enough in development to even run on the blockchain.
But you want everyone to trust this offchain untrustworthy non-working code. (That is rich.) Cheesy

If I don't need onchain solutions that can be trusted,
but according to you only use offchain solutions that can't be trusted , I might as well just stick with visa.
According to you a bank is safer, since they are offchain.
(But we know that is a lie , cause banks run fractional reserves just like LN will.)
(If they can ever get it working without segwit that is.) Wink

FYI:
Funny you making yourself the authority of what security is needed for purchases, kind of sounds like a Banker is pulling your strings.

FYI2:
Litecoin & Dogecoin is cheaper & faster and are still ONCHAIN, so they are more trustworthy than LN.