Quote from: pda713 on February 15, 2017, 01:01:10 AM

Has anyone considered that right under our noses is the distributed ledger of history of the past few thousand years, and it is ironically concurrent although translated differently throughout the world?

I've spent a bit of time in this area, and I've noticed that we've perhaps unwittingly started "Bible 2.0", essentially a more streamlined historical document with higher distribution and more direct and unmistakable correlation to date recorded.

I've designed a thought experiment around this concept, and along with visiting other metaphysical topics, it makes complete logical sense.

I'm not sure of the reception to expect if I run the entire TL;DR past the community as composed, so here is the free trial on this topic. Burn at stake, or viably consider?

I am sure that the Church immediately condemn the Bible as a result, very many believers will not read it. Atheists do not care to read the existing Bible, why would they read the Bible 2.0?