. Open source is a paradigm shift which creates an
which does not suffer the Tragedy of the Commons prisoner's dilemma...
...
we go, and cull all this useless dead weight left over from the Industrial Age.
The nation-state was necessary for aggregating capital for the Industrial Age, but it has lost is reason to exist. And btw, this is why when Armstrong mentioned the USA would break up, it immediately seemed plausible to me.
Because I have been explaining we are moving from the Industrial (fixed capital) Age to the Knowledge Age where individuals will own their productive capacity and can't be bought with financial capital.
Thus the nation-state concept has peaked. The globalists are consolidating power now to try to fend off the Knowledge Age, but they will fail (although they will succeed to enslave those who don't transition and remain dependent on the one world reserve currency and governments).
...
The individual is rising. Government is dying, and as it last hurrah it will descend into one world government which in fact already exists de facto as the DEEP STATE.
These comments make it painfully obvious that Armstrong does not
understand the global trend underway with the transition from the
Industrial (fixed capital) Age to individual ownership of one's productive
capital in the Knowledge Age. For details on that trend, refer to my prior
writings upthread. Specifically knowledge workers today can produce and
distribute their own work individually without relying on the Theory of
the Firm and finance. The 3D printer is yet another example of this trend
underway.
He is framing the issue with the wrong perspective, thus he entirely
misses the point and thus the correct conclusion.
Crypto-currency doesn't need the entire world's confidence and acceptance.
The sovereign Knowledge Age workers are adopting it...
The rest of humanity will descend into enslavement in a one world reserve
currency and a de facto DEEP STATE that runs the dying fixed capital age
and the concept of the nation-state which raison d'etre was the politics
of finance.
See the one world outcome is the death star of collectivism. Again I refer
him to my seminal article on the Rise of Knowledge:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=355212.0Focus on the "Rise of Knowledge" essay and understand why savings must
decay otherwise knowledge doesn't advance.
I expounded on a later blog:
http://unheresy.com/Information%20Is%20Alive.html#Thought_Isn%27t_Fungible...
Armstrong is stuck in an anarchic idea of government and finance. He is
blinded to the decentralized rise of the sovereign individual in the
Knowledge Age. Thus to his hammer everything looks like a nail. He can
only see everything in terms of government. He can't see the true
revolution going on which government can't do a damn thing to stop.
Let them try to turn off the electricity. Watch how fast the Knowledge Age
workers engineer a solution that bypasses their grid.
Checkmate for the Industrial Age, nation-states, and voting. Those are the
dinosaurs.
When will Armstrong have the epiphany and realize what time it really is?
His model is screaming that I am correct. Yet he is blinded by his old age
and ingrained thought patterns and experience as a hedge fund manager.