Quote from: wwdz99 on February 17, 2017, 06:59:58 AM

Quote from: Evil-Knievel on December 05, 2016, 07:18:07 PM

Quote from: HunterMinerCrafter on December 05, 2016, 06:54:24 PM

Let me know what you think. Wink

I think
a) that it is sweet to see that my first "idea" was not so bad after all
and
b) that

Code:

Largest error: 1.94385646144

seems hard to beat
and last but not least
c) that I hope to get the one or another improvement suggestion from you, even after the contest ist over and we have seen this method "in action" in the upcoming 0.9.0 testnet Wink

Quote from: Evil-Knievel on December 05, 2016, 08:10:26 PM

Hunterminercrafter:
Largest error: 1.89787520814

L'oracle (PM submission from 07:42:50 PM, someone can verify this in my account if wanted):
Largest error: 1.89720766492

My own one (shame on me)
Largest error: 5.31689202348

VeryNewMember:
Largest error: 5.9709180146

Here, all algorithms in zipped form. Change the first line in tester.py to evaluate a specific submission:
http://www.xup.in/dl,17161517/retarget_algorithms.tar.gz/

Does that seem correct so far?
Unbelieveable, how close the two best submissions were.

If everyone agrees with the result, I would need loracle's BTC address to get rid of my hard earned BTC. Wink

So EK,the winner "idea" be used in elastic now?

HI EK,

I see elastic test block chain peers in http://elasticexplorer.org/peers/ , there have 0.9.0 testnet version peer,

so u made before contest winner 'idea' algo have build in 0.9.0?

Regards.