Quote from: cryptohunter on February 18, 2017, 12:34:29 PM

Quote from: synechist on February 17, 2017, 09:51:49 PM

Quote from: FogClearer on January 29, 2017, 06:01:08 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on January 28, 2017, 08:49:23 AM

so they take a million dollars in funds and abandon xc to get delisted even from bittrex?

time to do a more thorough investigation into dan metcalf.

even the smallest coins made effort to generate some volume to avoid delisting.

I will be creating a new thread in the main section to bring attention to this and investigate this more thoroughly.

Blocknet can not exist without XC. You can't abandon projects like this in crypto and be taken seriously.

As much as it sucks for XC to loose Bittrex, Blocknet still has XC for it's decentralized exchange and ongoing development as it seems.

Looking forward to synechist/atcsecure comments in this thread too.

@cryptohunter, I'll reply to this comment only. Your remarks are blatantly untrue and highly abusive. Please try to contain yourself in future.

We did not take a million. Look it up.

We have worked for over 2 years to create what we believe is the right approach to inter-chain infrastructure. Development has not stopped, and nothing has been abandoned.

I include XC here: it is under active development.

Regarding XC's delisting, you make unjustifiable assumptions about the cause of delistings, and unjustifiable assumptions about what keeps a coin listed. Perhaps get some experience before posting?

We continue to develop, support, and test, XC, and when the time is ripe for user adoption, then we may target this market. Until then, you can choose to support the project or leave it alone.

If you would like to see for yourself the work that is being done, and understand our goals for XC, then I'd encourage you to join its slack.

then we may choose to target this market??? so what happens to XC holders if you don't choose to do so.

Also please direct me to the comments I made which are untrue?

Is xc still on bittrex?
Are xc or blocknet still on polo?
Did you guys make any effort like other devs for far smaller projects to increase trading volume to keep xc listed on bittrex?
What are these mysterious factors the influence delisting on bittrex except the minimum trade volume and active development team?

Where are the updates on this board ?
the board xc was launched on and garnered all initial support?
the board where you ran the crowd funding for blocknet?
the board where 99% of crypto enthusiasts are?

So this is the choice for xc holders now.... support you apparently doing nothing for 2 years on XC and for all we know on this board not a a lot else on any of these projects or leave it alone?

Do you reasonably believe anyone would have invested in blocknet or even touched XC if this is the way thing were going to go 2 years ago?

You and dan are both scared to face any questions on this board so closed the xc thread and abandoned this one.

You either avoid the thread and the questions contained within or like a coward just hit the delete button since then the questions just vanish without a trace.

I am awaiting blocknet getting delisted on bittrex next. What will you say about that?

i can not say any real figure for it...because it takes sudden turn...