Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] HEAT: 3.0 crypto*multisig fiat*a2a hft*1000tps*DSA*PoS+PoP*e2ee chat*
by
tempus
on 19/02/2017, 06:14:45 UTC
The previous links don't lead to anything but the immediate previous posts of the psychotic person harassing this thread. That issue will soon be remedied with the moderated thread.
negative patterns, like a lack of accuracy or clear signs of dishonesty or whatever, is usually a clear sign to stay away.
Within any of the remaining time we have here for the troll debate I wonder, tempus, what negative patterns you implicate, coming in from 3 months of silence after expressing criticism that didn't receive any foothold.

Is there a chance you'll change your stance when the HEAT token value has doubled from the ICO? If not, will you change it when the token value has quadrupled?

Have you earned your legendary member status by quoting irrelevant posts from half a year ago to support troll campaigns of various clearly psychotic members of the society?



To answer your question about the price first: Prices are not necessarily indicators. I mean, it's much easier to get the price of an illiquid market up than a project done, right? That is done every day on multiple exchanges even with dead projects.


About StewieB: His attitude may be questionable, but that doesn't change the fact that he has some valid points.


He asked this:

(...)
Where is the promised buy wall (...)

You replied with:

(...)
There exists no such promise and it's detrimental for everyone to twist what has been said. (...)


He confronted you with this:

(...)  I can now make a promise: We will be using some ICO funds for price level support (in some form of buy walls, in a way that has the highest impact). I can't recall making explicit promises earlier. Personally I'm proud to have got a habit of keeping them whenever possible, so if there's any other impression please point out the reference and I'll humbly amend such a mistake.



Back in June, when you and I had our "fight-conversations" you also tried to mislead people and in fact you lied. Now you say I would quote irrelevant posts, but exactly that is part of the pattern and you've already showed it back then. And it's really no surprise for me how this project turned out since then. I also told you this:


  (...)
 Money won't be a compensation for the pressure you will earn if you go on with that. Disappointed Investors are much worse than I am here.  (...)

That is your problem with guys like StewieB. I mean, he is not the usual troll or Fudster. He is one of your Investors. And as far as I know the above is not the only valid point he confronted you with. Most likely it would be possible to make a list. My advice to him would be to keep things on topic, without big letters and all the shit-talk. It's very entertaining but the paradox-part is: It makes it easier for you to ignore it or to claim it's trolling or "agenda".

And of course you can tell people that my latest criticism "didn't receive any foothold" - but you already plan your next funding round. So let's see if I can quote myself again in some months. Right now I don't even believe that there will be another funding round. And if yes, I would be very surprised if people would send you much money.

By the way, what I really don't understand is: Why didn't you hire Developers? Why didn't you hire somebody to do the communication and for marketing etc.? I mean, there is nothing that would indicate that you invested the ICO-money really into and for the best of this project. Even more surprising it is that you already plan another funding round.

HEy it is StewieG!  

Uppps... my fault! But I'm sure, you'll survive and forgive my little mistake, StewieBBB....äääähhGGGGGGGG!!!! Cheesy

Quote
 
And yes they plan to do the IPO, I was surprised as well. That is why they desperately try to get rid of this thread! xD

And no, nobody will participate in this bullshit! I already asked their loyalist dicksuckers in the slack and not even they want to participate in it!

Oh and they claim they couldn't find any devs. This is plausible as nobody would want to work with this retards. I mean you would burn your reputation immediately. But it is also plausible that they are just trying to hold as much money for themselves. I mean it is obvious that this project is doomed, why invest in it? They avoided every situation in which they would spend some of the funds, they even claim they have invested 200k so far. Even said they will provide an expense sheet. But they said a lot of things and delivered nothing and the expense sheet is not any different. Nobody knows where this money went and they refuse to tell us. Nono these monkeys will just pay themselves a nice salary every month until the funds are gone.


I don't believe that there will be a second round. It's predictable what questions they would have to answer and how that would turn out. Or with other words: What they clearly don't need is more attention on this.
Yeah okay I forgive you, hope it doesn't happen again... Roll Eyes   

I would promise it if you wouldn't be so vitriol accusing everyone to break promises who broke promises! Cheesy


Quote

Dude, they really plan to do this! They really think they can pull off another funding round scam! I know I know, I was shocked as well. I thought they can not be serious about that! But hey, concerning heat, I have believed about a lot of things to be different! Trust me, they really think they can pull this off! And no matter what the result will be, they will sell it to people as a success! They claim their launch was a success! Picture this! This fuck forks multiple times a day, you had to download and install the blockchain manually everytime it happend. By now they decided to mine alone and leave others out due to the forking issue! The A2A is broken, man I can not even send my coins! Nothing works! REALLY NOTHING! I AM TOTALLY HONEST HERE, NOTHING WORKS! And they claim it was a successfull launch! And this retard can not see what he is doing wrong! Dude, I have no words for that! There are no words for that!

(...)

We will see who of us will be right. Right now it's pretty much unbelievable for me that they will try to get more money.

And just btw: If I understand their plan for the second funding correctly it is an economical disaster, even if this project would be good so far. Rational participants of the previous ICO would send them Heat-token to get shares, since shares are usually more valuable than the token. To really get money they would have to sell those tokens and that would bring pressure on the price. And that could and would be anticipated and the token-price would go down even before the next IPO.

And just that would be enough that rational potential Investors who are not already invested in tokens would stay away, because they (Heat-team) connect the value of the shares to the price of the tokens (x amount of token = 1 share).

It's not easy to explain in a few words, but it's a crazy economical circle that wouldn't even benefit THEM! They won't be able to sell, because there won't be enough buy-support and they won't get real money because it's not possible that the value of the shares would rise if the token gets dumped. And it's not possible that the token stays above ...and so on....down-circle....