Quote from: marlboroza on February 19, 2017, 11:06:27 AM

Quote from: gully on February 19, 2017, 07:00:28 AM

They were caught cheating cards on Blackjack, video evidence below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1EiWvN11nU#t=02m

PLEASE, PLEASE DO NOT BET.

Omg, how stupid you have to be to cheat live? With camera on? And that bastard is smiling!
Nice catch OP, i saw this kind of things only in movies.

These casinos they use are with live dealers video feeds?!?

IF they are then the live dealer provider is responsible for being caught cheating their players who use the operator in this case betonline, and are the one who should be the ones who are fined and have their gambling license revoked for cheating and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the laws against fraud.
You know how much money they are making on these live dealer sites? Millions per day. I have seen people betting 10,000 BTC hands and losing them while there just for 1 or 2 hands. These casinos win more than what the players actually win and that is within the 10 minutes that I was at the last casino that I was using last week. That is just not acceptable for them to even cheat their players when the game is hard enough as it is to win with the amount of decks they use in a shoe (something like 8 decks which I was told by their official casino pitboss several times).
Find out which provider they are using and get a class action lawsuit going and you will win it because of the video proof being recorded.
I have seen a lot deceitful things at these live dealer casinos that I have been preevy to recording it they would be shutdown for cheating long ago because everything is recorded by the providers and they must hand these in if the operator are suspect of them of doing things that can get their license revoked from caught cheating on camera. That is the law! And if they don't then they will lose millions if not a billion in civil law suits filed against them and they are obligated to hand them over in a court of law if a dispute is filed against them.
The name of the company provider are they using?