Quote from: passerby on April 10, 2013, 08:29:22 AM

'cause I can like myself a strongly pseudonymous, online wallet that is sufficiently feature-rich...So come on, AMAZE ME.

What features would you suggest?

Quote from: parno on April 10, 2013, 03:20:32 PM

unlike others I would welcome you around and suggest Google Authentication as an option, honesty and trust is hard when it comes to money so maybe you understand how "others" see you

I'm not easily offended, and I certainly see why people might be suspicious of a wallet service.

Thanks for the welcome - very appreciated.

As to google auth - well, it's not exactly a nice thing code-wise, but it is rather useful, thanks for the suggestion.

I think that adding support for their two-factor auth system is not out of the question if/when we decide to expand beyond "quickiewallet" philosophy (which is what I think passerby is hinting at)

Quote from: someguy123 on April 10, 2013, 11:23:14 AM

The only feature I see that instawallet didn't have, is the ability to password your wallet.
Also I don't even know if these guys charge fee's, they don't mention it anywhere on their site, so that could be a plus if there isn't a fee.

Well, so far we're just on BTC fees - would be kinda unfair to charge people for an early beta of a service, I think.

Speaking of fees, it seems that if we were to expand to a more... comprehensive feature suite, we'd have to either adopt some fee system or place ads, and it appears to me that people loathe ads in wallet services (and not only the rather risky "rich media" ads, it seems)