Quote from: bloodnest on February 21, 2017, 12:32:47 PM

This is something I'd strongly disagree with. Perhaps it would be okay if Bitcoins was accepted as some sort of side-service by a financial institution like a bank and that "bank" respects the autonomy of its clients, but having one I guess that kind of forces people to aggregate especially if it's some kind of national one and go through it in order to use bitcoins would defeat the purpose of a decentralized system. It'll be collecting information and having walls for you to need go through before having access which both kind of is why we have bitcoins in the first place.

True,I don't agree too. It's value will have no significant difference in other guard plus that we can't barely monitor our bitcoin. There were more possibilities of reduction due to taxes. I will still choose how bitcoin is now. We can control it securely via wallets and perform transactions by our own.