Quote from: LiskHQ on February 22, 2017, 07:34:40 AM

Quote from: kolap on February 21, 2017, 08:20:05 PM

Quote from: gigabyted on February 21, 2017, 07:15:19 PM

Quote from: jayohby on February 21, 2017, 07:11:05 PM

Quote from: Poly#Crypto on February 21, 2017, 05:48:27 PM

Furthermore, a pre-payment of around 200,000 EUR (213.610 CHF) was conducted with one of the Lisk Foundation's main contractors which handles development, marketing and community support. This pre-payment is not for January only, after the first quarter the real costs can be better estimated.

the team doesn't even do their own development. they contract it out to a third party - who knows who this is?? lol

garbage team.

Lol its a non profit, they can't pay themself with it. But they can pay LightCurve thou... It's only a structure to be able to use those funds according the the country laws

It's seem to me majority of Lisk coding is done by fixscrypt but now fixscrypt already moved to Ark. I read on Ark forum Lisk codebase is full of bugs because of rushing out so fixcrypt rewrote it again for Ark. It need to be bug free before they can releasing Ark. My experience I have ton of problems with Lisk on Polionex, deposit and withdrawal. I'm surprised Poloniex still have Lisk.

Every contribution can be seen here: https://github.com/LiskHQ/lisk/graphs/contributors

Make your own assumptions, however please with accurate data.

GitHub can prove nothing, don't matter how much you pushing out or commits if you don't have the skill you would just pushing out craps again and again, then repeats. This is the case for Lisk at this point. By pointing this out, you also have no experience and don't think through, which proved you don't have thinking process.