This thread is probably getting too much off-topic with this discussion, although in my opinion, it is not, in the sense that to me, anonymous crypto was the missing piece in the puzzle of how humanity could let the singularity happen without noticing, and how individual machines could build an economy and political power without people noticing.  So in that respect, crypto has a function, an important one, and if ever I can contribute to that, I would like to (I'm in favor of a singularity and the demise of humanity after my death: the idea that people would live happy after I'm gone pisses me off to some point...).

Concerning your hypothesis of me "wanting to win a discussion", you're wrong, I only discuss on a forum to get input for my own ideas.  You're only a source of entropy for me, I don't care much what you might think, what others might think or whatever.  I don't need a public, I need input for my own thinking, the only thing that really matters in this world.  As such, you have contributed to it and I thank you.  Although your basic point is correct, I think you're totally wrong on the orders of magnitude, which invalidates your rebuttal, because you're confusing physical entropy, and actual relevant information.  Actual information is limited by physical entropy, but there's a lot of useless noise in physical entropy.  A hot stove sends out tons of physical entropy, but doesn't contribute much to the intelligence (the financial, scientific, political and economical intelligence) of the receiver.  But by having to argue, you obliged me to put upper limits to numbers, which helped me in my thinking, and I thank you for that.