Quote from: Bit2Easy on February 24, 2017, 03:07:30 PM

Quote from: game-protect on February 24, 2017, 07:28:36 AM

OgNasty extorted me to remove my negative feedback that he promote the publicly proven betcoin.ag scam for his own financial benefit = criminal offense!
(Original pms still stored in my account)

This is doubtless a good place to send your coins...

OgNasty: "@Lutpin: Really should kill himself."

But it hasn't been proven that betcoin is a scam, has it? I read the entire thread regarding the "Glam Life slot payout" scandal and as far as I know, it was Betsoft whose game was being played and whom didn't pay to the winner. Therefore I don't think OgNasty did anything wrong whilst wearing betcoin.ag's signature for a compensation. I read a bit of that lutpin vs nasty thread, and I do believe there was a misunderstanding and it got handled accordingly. That being said, I will definetly be buying a seat in NastyFans in the future.

Whether or not Betcoin is a scam is a completely different issue from OgNastys behavior. (I recommend reading the settlement and how Betcoin behaved afterwards in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1667860.0) (also, keep in mind the 1,000 btc jackpot scandal is only one of many on a long list of scummy behavior)

OgNasty received several pms immediately after joining their sig campaign informing him of the situation. Rather than look at the situation objectively, he lashed out and spread numerous lies including false extortion accusations against Luptin, GP and myself. A week or two later he ended removing his signature anyway. He continues to stand behind his lies out of pure stubbornness/ego. (reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1618843.msg16251220#msg16251220)

Also consider the fact that he is now a sig campaign manager for a casino on this forum and also Betcoin.com forum after saying this:

Quote from: OgNasty on August 01, 2016, 11:21:34 PM

I have made my comments about signature campaigns publicly known. I'm not going to go back searching through threads to try and find my comments or waste any more time explaining why giving a user negative feedback for who won their auction is ridiculous, or waste my time pointing out that they bought my signature and anyone is welcome to do so. If you choose who is trustworthy by who spends the most on advertising, you have a long hard life ahead of you. Take some responsibility and let other people be responsible for who they choose to gamble with. I couldn't care less. As far as I'm concerned all gambling sites are scams that prey on people's addictions. Trying to say that I deserve negative feedback because of which scam won my auction is once again ridiculous.

Quote from: OgNasty on August 02, 2016, 05:05:05 AM

I've been extremely vocal that I think signature campaigns are evil. I've done everything I can to bring a stop to them. I've even made proposals to limit them to extremes. I also think that gambling is evil and do not support or condone it in any way, nor do I participate.

We are all adults here. Everyone knows it is a paid signature. Easy for you to say to give the money back, but unless you want to put your money where your mouth is, please spare me the lectures.

[/quote]