Quote from: logictense on February 24, 2017, 04:09:08 PM

They got more than 2 percent. I assure u that they do hold much more of a carbon than sheeple thinks, but as long as the price is low as it is now the size of their holdings has a little to no weight on impartiality and fairness of distribution because everyone can amass as more carbon as they wish though more time may be needed. Note theres no activity in markets which proves the point that money does not change hands meaning everyone is deliberately overlooking this coin. Why? Seek whales among ur supporters and betrayers and ask them.

Each individual is urged not to own more than 2%. I would not stop any member of the team owning the maximum if they wished to pay what it cost to acquire it, moreover for three years of hard work, 2% of a coin valued at $370 000, isn't really all that much - remember these coins are not as a result of any premine and therefore would absolutely have to be acquired fair and square through either mining or trading.

EDIT: If you want to have a look at most of the cryptocurrencies in existence 2% of total circ is extremely low. Have a delve into some of the rich lists of some of the major cryptocurrencies.

Some 70% of the circulation of the coin has been placed into the hands of people new to cryptocurrencies in accordance with this 2% rule. This is a decent explanation for the absence of any sell-side depth on the exchange.

The lack of trading is due in part to the large gap between bid and offer price, and in part due to the fact that our business to business operations haven't even started yet.

The reality as was previously mentioned is that you could not get 2% right now if you wanted to at exchange, they are not available.

I do not know who you are referring to when you mention sheeple, that would imply some sort of mass participation, which I actually feel we have yet to see to any real extent yet. Yet, of course, is the big word there.