Quote from: BTCat on February 27, 2017, 08:11:34 PM

Quote from: malafaya on February 27, 2017, 07:46:32 PM

After running a quick search on previous suspicious addresses, I think there are at least 40k out of Cryptopia for this whale (30k is the minimum total deposited at Cryptopia currently, as many change addresses are still not accounted for at CryptoID).

I would raise a flag here to keep respecting coinholders privacy somehow. Even though many addresses can be identified in the end each holder can buy or sell how he wants (without being bashed for it). Just don't like the kind of witchhunt sphere that starts to shape around this. It's not perse the best attitude a coin should promote and seriously not a way to keep investors aboard.

Hi, BTCat.

As far as anonimity is concerned, the holder is protected. Just by identifying some transactions with address 5someAddressHere doesn't mean you're revealing who the holder is. Regarding transactional behavior, I'm afraid the information is all public in the blockchain and it doesn't take much expertise to dig something up (unless of course the affected party hides their trail, which also takes minimum effort). In fact, all you need is to follow a single transaction to Cryptopia backwards, and you can see an outgoing pattern. My purpose was just to give people a clue of how much CBX is involved here.
P.S. mind that there's margin for error in my estimates in the previous post.

As for holders (namely, the whale(s)) "being bashed for it [their transactions]", I don't think it is related to digging up addresses like just now. If there's been any bashing, it has been taking place for a long time now. This is not a new topic.