Quote from: r0ach on March 03, 2017, 04:12:10 AM

Quote from: jbreher on March 03, 2017, 02:48:42 AM

Quote from: r0ach on March 02, 2017, 09:07:15 PM

The fact that bitcoin can be so called "upgraded", which really just means changed, means it's not anti-fragile by default.

On this point, you minsunderstand the definition of anti-fragile. By definition, in order to be anti-fragile, a thing must be able to evolve.

No, it does not. Money is supposed to be boring - it's not supposed to "evolve" ...

Stay on point. I did not say 'money needs to be able to evolve', I said that the definition of 'anti-fragile' necessarily is imbued with the ability to evolve.

You can claim that something needs to be unchanging if you want. While I disagree with you on this point, it is not a conversation I wish to carry out with you. You have a lot of monetary ideas which I think are just plain wrong, but they are axiomatic to you, and I don't care to tilt against that windmill.

However, when you appropriate a defined term, and claim a use for it exactly opposite of its accepted definition -- such as your misappropriation of anti-fragile -- you can expect to get called out on it.