Quote from: BADecker on March 03, 2017, 11:29:34 PM

Quote from: stats on March 03, 2017, 01:53:14 AM

Quote from: BADecker on March 02, 2017, 03:36:45 PM

Quote from: stats on March 02, 2017, 04:41:01 AM

Quote from: BADecker on March 01, 2017, 09:03:41 PM

Thank you for rebutting my talk. Now rebut the proof that God exists:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Oh, that's right. You have failed miserably in the past. Why? Because God exists.

Cool

Has been rebutted but you do not recognise it.

Therefore, to use your exact same logic..... Your links are not proof. Give me proof.

The reality of the situation is that you are blinded by any other reality than what you believe and when it is rebutted, you simply say it isn't rebutted. Well the same principal will now apply and I will call it the "BADecker principle". Your links are not proof so give me proof.

Still waiting for you to show the rebuttal, rather than flimsy words that suggest that there is rebuttal.

Cool

BADecker principle rule number 1: If a point of discussion does not meet criteria of one's own belief, then ignore it and claim it is wrong.

Therefore, your proof is wrong, so please give me more proof.

Besides, it is up to you to prove your god, not me to disprove. But when you say it is real, I will ask for proof.

Ha, ha, HA, Ha, ha. You can't rebut the proof. Ha, ha, HA, Ha, ha. Cheesy

Ha, ha, HA, Ha, ha. You can't provide any proof. Ha, ha, HA, Ha, ha. Cheesy