Quote from: Fredomago on March 04, 2017, 03:45:11 AM

Quote from: BlockchainOS on March 04, 2017, 03:35:12 AM

Quote from: m140v on March 02, 2017, 05:16:44 PM

It's hard to get consensus on changes to blockchains these days. Especially when we're dealing with proof-of-work and allowing miners to vote, putting all of the power of the voting system into the hands of people who have incentives to collect higher fees by keeping the transaction throughput low (Decreasing bandwidth supply with heightening demand). This can slow down progress regarding change proposals to the Bitcoin protocol. Bitcoin has taught us much. What if there were a network of verifying and mining nodes that bet (based on the number of other nodes that bet on them to mine blocks well) on changes... Then we might have a system in which the goal of the community would be heard and could be implemented, instead of great fixes sitting on ice for... prolonged... periods... of... time.
Thoughts?

That's a really good point. Not only Bitcoin but also Ethereum has no consensus mechanism for the blockchain code itself. This absence make them hard to evolve. To cope with this problem, we introduced Congress for decision making. Please refer to Whitepaper. We will explain it in details afterward.

if this congress will be implemented properly it will be a good help to the user's and miners avoiding to increase the fee
if this project will deliver well we will be able to see a project which can be successful in the long run, but dev you need
to convince those audience which is also trying to learn more about this coin.

Thanks for your advice. We will be providing more information to convince those audiences and share details as our devs continue to develop.
We learned through experiences what happened in Bitcoin and Ethereum communities. We found there are several issues that should be complemented, and consensus for the blockchain code itself is one of them. Thanks for your interest!!