Quote from: -ck on March 04, 2017, 10:17:10 PM

Quote from: organofcorti on March 02, 2017, 02:53:22 AM

Quote from: -ck on February 28, 2017, 08:25:00 PM

OOC, given the block size debate is currently an issue, would it be too much to ask to signify what pools are running? legacy, segwit, BU or miner's choice?

Sure, is there an already existing list available that I can add to the tables?

Not as far as I know, but I think the following is what I see from signalling (of the public pools):

Segwit: BTCC, Bitcoin India, Bitclub Network, Solo ckpool, Bitminter
BU: btc.top, bitcoin.com, gbminers, ViaBTC
Option: Slush
Legacy: Everyone else?

EDIT: Check here:
https://coin.dance/blocks

Legacy as in cgminer?

segwit is only a block size solution for using 3x addresses, and as the name implies, is a fix for the badly designed P2SH, not an attempt at a block size solution. That's purely a side effect of not using 1x addresses, that most people have and use.

So at best, if OOC adds a column entitled "block size", then segwit is partial at best.
Why is the majority of bitcoin suddenly going to abandon 1x addresses and use 3x addresses?

... and everyone should make sure their code works with 3x addresses and segwit