Quote from: Chronobank_Community on March 04, 2017, 04:30:27 PM

Quote from: electronicash on March 04, 2017, 04:01:49 PM

so its true that you were not distributing the bounties correctly like it was meant that you are to distribute 3000 TIME for blog bounties and yet you didn't because over all the total that you were about to distribute was just 400 TIME. ain't that the works of the crooks? while the rest of us hate them being the dumpers, we also like it because it make coins cheap where investors can buy more. give them what is rightfully theirs.

I would be less prone to run with any rumor you hear from a random person. It's not even remotely true. Many entries were not even 10% unique. The bounty is supposed to be for people who make original work and post it on their blogs, said blogs are supposed to have a lot of people who view them. Not just 4 people. If we stuck to those guidelines, very few people would be accepted to that bounty.

That is why it's being re-worked yet again, to lower our required standards to include more people. It has nothing to do with wild baseless accusations. Who's the crook here? The guys offering to pay people for a blog post, or the guys copy/pasting already written articles and calling it their work?

Wasn't it the reason why its re-eveluated because it seem like the 2600 TIME were missing to which there was an attempt not to distribute it?

if there were users copypasting them eliminate them on the list. so long as its sum is 3000, it good. lets see them dump.