Quote from: traincarswreck on March 07, 2017, 12:17:07 AM

In regard to agent. There is no such quote with satoshi explicitly stating a block size increase is eminent. Any quote you have provided or will provide will not have satoshi saying. Every quote you provide will imply it only in your opinion.

That is what i am saying. And its a falsifiable claim, because you could produce evidence to the contrary. Keep in mind, I don't have to convince you. You have to convince us, with proof. Not implication.

I think this quote comes pretty darn close:

Quote from: satoshi on August 05, 2010, 04:03:21 PM

Forgot to add the good part about micropayments. While I don't think Bitcoin is practical for smaller micropayments right now, it will eventually be as storage and bandwidth costs continue to fall. If Bitcoin catches on on a big scale, it may already be the case by that time. Another way they can become more practical is if I implement client-only mode and the number of network nodes consolidates into a smaller number of professional server farms. Whatever size micropayments you need will eventually be practical. I think in 5 or 10 years, the bandwidth and storage will seem trivial.

Taken at face value it means that Satoshi envisioned Bitcoin to eventually have a high TPS.

Now this does not take away from all your Nashian arguments as to why it might be a good idea to leave the block size alone.

I think it does mean that you should stop claiming Satoshi actually created what you/Nash are looking for on purpose. It looks more like it was created as a happy coincidence due to a temporary bug fix.