Quote from: abvhiael on March 07, 2017, 05:36:23 PM

FUNDING some of the things that would quickly push adoption is another issue. simple things such as a registered SOILcoin web address and hosting (my example yesterday of soilco.in was $16CDN, or abt .01BTC. if i can wrangle that from my personal budget, in the next week or so, ill set it up) and to have funded hard nodes (perhaps what any fees from a community mining pool could be used to cover) running to ensure network uptime. many exchanges have quick listing options with the use of BTC. i think it was YoBit that i experienced a nightmare with trying to get us listed, but they may have improved their service since then.

...

with the funds set up already for listing at novaexchange, id urge getting SOIL listed for community voting at the very least as soon as possible. a twitter campaign for votes may prove fruitful as the threshole for inclusion is only 250 votes and im sure i could talk at least a dozen friends to sign up to nova just to vote for us... its one vote a day per user, so organizing that wont be too hard.

Abvhiael, when we were talking about trying to get listed again I purchased a paid weebly account setup for hosting at www.cryptosoil.com. It is already prepaid for a year. There are no ads since it's paid and it has a blog page built in. I could provide credentials to our developers and we could use that for a year, then consider switching over to a new domain name when renewal runs next February. You can build out however you want if that would work.

As for Nova exchange, I read you get one free vote a day then you can buy votes by purchasing NPOINTS. They are cheaper than purchasing .4 btc line skip feature. We should rally as much support as possible then close out missing votes with NPOINTS.

Also, I don't know if technically feasible, but can we split block rewards like DASH and have a percentage that goes into a community fund and a percentage that goes to coinholders of a certain minimum threshold who are running nodes to keep the network stable? This would also act as a protection against project abandonment if mining farm attacks continue because all the rewards wouldn't be tied to mining and our nodes would still have an incentive to keep network running. it's likely the nodes and community miners will be the same group in the beginning anyway, so this may actually protect community miners against having their block rewards shut down completely by mining farm attacks.