Quote from: Cassius on March 07, 2017, 05:48:34 PM

Quote from: gbdesai on March 07, 2017, 05:13:52 PM

Quote from: KarlKarlsson_ on March 07, 2017, 10:04:03 AM

Quote from: soloasi on March 07, 2017, 10:00:46 AM

Quote from: Cassius on March 07, 2017, 09:14:35 AM

Quote from: Cassius on March 07, 2017, 08:57:55 AM

Quote from: Litemit on March 07, 2017, 07:43:25 AM

Can INCENT dev complete the distribution of TOKES asap? Everytime tokes dev refer us to incent for delaying tokes distribution.
It would be nice if you say something like when your'e going to distribute all tokes?
Thank you

I will pass it on. Just to check, have you put your Waves address in the ICO area?

I've just checked. Support for Tokes has been suspended.
There was an MOA with Tokes to pay 5 BTC for the service Incent offered. They are refusing to honour this due to their raise being less than they expected.
Obviously this is not our responsibility. Until it is resolved all support is on hold.
I'd suggest that you take this up with Tokes in the meantime.

but this is about the +plus they were offering to eary buyers (as incent tokens)? or the TOKES tokens which are the actual coin? Huh

It's basically about all the work still to be done from our side. We are more than happy to fulfill our obligations but that requires TOKES to fulfill their part of the deal.

In short: TOKES is on hold until payment is received/escrowed.

All I see is incompetence on the part of Incent. I invested in both Incent and TOKES. First the "fantastic platform" Incent built crashed every other day. You provided poor support when you were contacted for help by users / participants. You overpaid a bunch of investors and asked for the Incent back post ICO.

You should be bending over backwards to the Tokes guys for selling them on a crappy ICO platform rather than pointing fingers.

The audacity of all this is unfathomable.

Not really. We are creating a platform and ecosystem and were quite transparent about what it involved and our timelines. Perhaps you didn't read the white paper or website?
It is necessary for us to trade on exchanges ahead of merchant integration to establish a market price before that buy pressure comes in. Besides, the community clamoured for Incent to be added to exchanges. Read back through the post history if you're in any doubt.
If you're upset that the market has treated Incent unfavourably when we're pre-launch (no merchant demand) and bitcoin is spiking, that is unfortunate but beyond our control. If you weren't prepared to wait until launch, you shouldn't have invested. We have always been crystal clear about where the return on investment would come from, and it's not burning the funds we collected. That is the very definition of a ponzi.
As for Tokes, there was an agreement there too. They didn't honour it. Take it up with them.

I think you're misunderstanding me. I'm talking about the ICO platform. I'm quite familiar with the long term vision of Incent and it's one of the reasons I put a decent amount into the ICO. I really don't even care about the current price.

I'm specifically talking about the quality of the software provided to do the ICO and the poor support Peter provided during the Tokes ICO. You contracted to provide an ICO platform that worked and almost nothing did. Look at the backscroll in the Tokes Slack, I'd be happy to provide the logs of my my less than useful chats with Peter. To say you met your obligations is an overstatement. I work in enterprise software and if we even screwed up even 10% of what you did, we'd have the whole engineering team living with the customer till it was right.

Don't take on projects you don't have time to do right.