Quote from: franky1 on March 07, 2017, 04:09:16 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on March 07, 2017, 03:57:42 PM

so you're saying the basic idea of emergent consensus that the core devs are pretending to be so freaked out about and claiming is so 'radically different' has actually been done already...

emergent consensus (BU specific proposal of dynamics) has not been around since day one because BU hasnt been around since day one. then again core hasnt been around since 2009 either. (it was satoshi-qt prior to 2013)

but the whole thing about "excessive blocks"(BU specific proposal) is about making policy.h more important as the lower threshold and the "FLAGGER", while making it more automatically moveable.. rather than manually movable.

in the past 2013 sipa and core devs had to manually move the policy.h and so did pools.. though nodes were not really using policy.h as the node validation of block rule. pools were reliant on it.

infact early clients had 3 layers
protocol =32mb
consensus=1mb
policy <500kb
in the early days

So chilled with laudbankbraking words:

BU is much more Satoshi consensus like than anything else (= hacked agenda stuff ) we ve seen before?

Grin