Quote from: windjc on March 07, 2017, 07:49:46 PM

Quote from: Jack Kuveke on March 07, 2017, 12:07:44 PM

Quote from: SeanPiknick on March 07, 2017, 04:48:51 AM

Quote from: windjc on March 06, 2017, 09:42:35 PM

Perhaps you should have waited to rate the ICO until you actually understood the basics of the ICO. It was obvious that you did not read the Russian whitepaper or have a basic understanding of what is being developed prior to your review. Now that Sergey has taken time out of his schedule to interview and answer all your questions, we should expect an actual accurate review score in my opinion.

After reviewing other projects on your list, I have to say I have some serious doubts about how you come to your conclusions. I am also interested in your track record to scoring ICOs. Did ones you scored high in the past actually perform well or provide results?

We need to do better as a community to do our jobs WELL. If that means owning a review site, then you should do your reviews WELL before publishing. You owe that to all people in the crypto space.

Since in the review my opinion was voiced, I will answer in the first-person.

I understand your call for responsibility for the published reviews, but I'm inclined to believe that my investment experience gives me the right to express my opinion about any project, including through the created site. The usefulness of these reviews will determine the community. As main result we already have - recorded interview with lead of project. By the way. After this intrview my opinion has not undergone a fundamental change... maybe it's happen in april 2017.

About other projects please read this page https://icotracker.net/about

I understand where you're coming from, but I think there is some merit to Jon's argument. It did seem you published a review of MobileGo without any real basis of what was going on. Perhaps you really do have great reasoning for the score you gave, but without providing reasons why it could be entirely based on opinion. I think we can both see a problem with that. You can't really dish out scores to projects without giving your detailed reasoning. Maybe now you're a bit annoyed with Jon because of his comments, so you're biased and just give the project bad marks. Without defining your individual process for each project, you don't give your website integrity, and you don't help projects improve/defend themselves.

Exactly. Back up your opinion with facts. Because right now you haven't offered one fact to back up your opinion. All we know is that you had fundamental misunderstandings about the project when you did the score. If you haven't changed your opinion after having your false assumptions corrected, then that just undermines your own credibility and the credibility of your site.

For instance, you score the roadmap as a 2. This is a joke honestly. I have invested in over 15 ICOs and MobileGo has the best roadmap of any I have ever seen. The core products have been in development already for 2 years and are going to be released BEFORE the ICO ends. Give me one example of another ICO currently coming out in the next 3 months that can say the same thing?

At this point, you probably have your feelings hurt, but your review says much more about your project than it does MobileGo.

Let's be correct in your statements, reduce aggression and let's me know where is my "fundamental misunderstandings", "false assumptions" etc. exactly. I understand that you are worried about the project and believe in it... well, I'm happy for you and I wish you to achieve your goals, while leaving me the right to have my own point of view.

In addition, the icotracker reflects the opinion of the team but not my personal. Yes, icotracket not ideal (say the least of it), but we don't pretend! We never declared the "truth in the last instance". Each project, including MobileGo has Curator - an person who can make mistakes, as in the case with thy roadmap of MobileGo. If we did not want to change and correct our mistakes, we would not have started recording an interview with Sergei. So cool down and get satisfaction.